Example essay that is academic
Example essay that is academic The Death Penalty. This essay shows many important features which commonly come in essays.
If the death penalty be restored in the united kingdom?
The restoration associated with death penalty for serious crimes is a problem of debate in the united kingdom due to the recent increase in violent crime. The reasons, effects and answers to the nagging problems of violent crime throw up a number of complex issues that are further complicated in addition that crime is reported. Newspapers often sensationalise crime to be able to increase circulation and also this makes discussion that is objective difficult. This essay will examine this topic firstly by taking into consideration the arguments put forward by those who work in favour of the death penalty and then by taking a look at the arguments opposed to the idea.
The main arguments in favour of restoring the death penalty are those of deterrence and retribution: the theory is that people will be dissuaded from violent crime that they gave out to others if they know they will face the ultimate punishment and that people should face the same treatment. Statistics show that whenever the death penalty was temporarily withdrawn in Britain between 1965 and 1969 the murder rate increased by 125% (Clark, 2005). However, we must think about the possibility that other reasons might have lead to this rise. Amnesty International (1996) claims it is impossible to prove that capital punishment is a greater deterrent than being given a full life sentence in prison and that “evidence….gives no support into the evidence hypothesis theory.” It seems at best that the deterrence theory is yet to be proven. The thought of ‘retribution’ is a fascinating one: there is certainly a basic appeal in the straightforward phrase ‘the punishment should fit the crime’. Calder (2003) neatly summarises this argument when he says that killers give up their rights when they kill and that if punishments are too lenient then it demonstrates that we undervalue the ability to live. There are other points too in support of the death penalty, one of these brilliant being cost. It really is obviously far cheaper to execute prisoners promply as opposed to feed and house them for years on end.
The arguments from the death penalty are mainly ethical in their nature, it sends out the wrong message to the rest of the country that it is basically wrong to kill and that when the state kills. Webber (2005) claims that the death penalty makes people believe that ‘killing people is morally permissable’. This will be an interesting argument – can you teach children to not hit by hitting them? Wouldn’t this instead demonstrate to them that hitting was indeed ‘permissable’? There’s also the reality that you may execute innocent people. Innocent people can invariably be released from prison, however they can’t ever be brought back from the dead. When people have been killed there’s absolutely no chance of rehabilitation or criminals trying to make up for crimes. For this good reason capital punishment has been called ‘the bluntest of blunt instruments’ (Clark, 2005).
To conclude, the arguments put forward by people who support or are from the death penalty often reflect their deeper principles and beliefs. These beliefs and principles are deeply rooted in life experiences as well as the way folks are brought up and are also unlikely to be swayed by clever arguments. It is interesting that in this national country most people are in preference of the death penalty yet parliament will continue to oppose it. In this case it might be argued that parliament is in the lead in upholding human rights and will continue to broadcast the clear message that killing is definitely wrong.
You ought to be in a position to observe that this essay consists of:
An introduction in three parts:
1. A sentence saying why the subject is relevant and interesting.
2. A sentence (or two) mentioning the difficulties and issues mixed essay writing up in topic.
3. A plan for the essay.
Main paragraphs with:
1. A topic sentence which provides a main idea/argument which tells us what your whole paragraph is approximately.
2. Evidence from outside sources which offer the argument(s) put forward in the sentence that is topic.
3. Some input that is personal the author analysing the points put forward in the topic sentence plus the outside sources.
Summarises the points that are main gives a solution into the question.